CSAI

Corpus of South Arabian Inscriptions


By kind permission of GOAM

INSCRIPTION INFORMATION

LanguageAncient South Arabian » Qatabanic » Central Qatabanic
AlphabetAncient South Arabian
Script typologyMonumental writing
Writing techniqueIncision
Measure of letters3
Chronology
PeriodC. Conjectural
Textual typologyDedicatory text

TEXT


   1  [Ts²ʿr]m Ṯgln Dlw s¹qn(y) [ʿ]—
   2  (m) (ḏ)-[D]wnm bʿl (Ḥ)ṭb T(m)[nʿ]
   3  (ḥg)-[n] (tk)rb-s¹ w-(ḥ)r(g)-(s¹)[ ʿm b-]
   4  [m](s¹)ʾl-(s¹ r)ṯd (Ts²)ʿrm [ʿm ḏ-Dw]—
   5  [n]m ʾḫ(h)-s¹ww w-ʾ[wld-s¹m w-ṣl]—
   6  (m)-s¹ bn ms¹nkrm w-(m)[s¹fʾym]

Apparatus
1instead of Ṯgln, it is possible to read Ṯlln.
2Tm[nʿ] is an integration by Jamme.
3-5All the integrations in the ll. 3-5 have been suggested by Jamme.

TRANSLATIONS

English

   1  Ts²ʿrm Ṯgln (or Ṯlln) Dlw dedicated to ʿ-
   2  m ḏ-Dwnm Master of Ḥṭb [... ...]
   3  as he asked Him and ʿm ordered him in
   4  His oracle; Ts²ʿrm committed to ʿm ḏ-Dw-
   5  nm his brothers and their children and his sta-
   6  tue against everyone who may damage or may move it.

OBJECT INFORMATION

DepositAden, The National Museum, NAM 2374=AM 60.1332
Support typeArtefact » Base » Of statue with dedicatory inscription
MaterialStone
Measuresh. 25, w. 21, th. 5.5
Link to object record

ORIGIN AND PROVENANCE

Origin
Modern siteHajar Kuḥlān
Ancient siteTmnʿ
Geographical areaWādī Bayḥān
CountryYemen
Archaeological contextReligious context: Temple of ʿm ḏ-Dwnm bʿl Ḥṭb
NotesAt l.2, Jamme's integration supports a provenance of the text from Timnaʿ. The letter m is readable quite well on the stone. Moreover, it is well known that, along with a sanctuary Ḥṭbm of ʿm ḏ-Dwnm in the city of ḏ-Ġylm, principally attested in our epigraphic sources in the period D, there was also a temple Ḥṭbm in the Qatabanian capital Timnaʿ, as witnessed by some of the legal texts on the city gate (see for instance RES 3566, 4). Here we should consider the phrase bʿl (Ḥ)ṭb T(m)[nʿ] a syntactically incorrect variant of the usual bʿl Ḥṭbm b-Tmnʿ, perhaps for a real mistake made by the engraver. Palaeography speaks also in favour of this interpretation. In fact, the style is clearly of the period C (when, according to texts, the sanctuary of Timnaʿ is still existing), rather than the D one (which will exclude by it self a provenance from Timnaʿ).
Link to site record

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Jamme 1971 b: 133-134Jamme, Albert W.F. 1971. Miscellanées d'ancient arabe II. Washington. 2019/07/23; https://cuislandora.wrlc.org/islandora/object/cuislandora%3A206497#page/1/mode/1up. [Privately printed]
CIAS: ii, 213-215, photoBeeston, Alfred F.L., Pirenne, Jacqueline and Robin, Christian J. 1977-1986. Corpus des inscriptions et antiquités sud-arabes:
Vol. I (1977): Tome 1. Inscriptions. Tome 2. Antiquités;
Vol. II (1986): Le Musée d’Aden. Tome 1. Inscriptions. Tome 2. Antiquités
. Louvain: Peeters. [Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-lettres]