CSAI
Corpus of South Arabian Inscriptions


By kind permission of Mission Qatabān

INSCRIPTION INFORMATION

LanguageAncient South Arabian » Qatabanic » Central Qatabanic
ScriptAncient South Arabian
Script typologyMonumental writing
Text directionBoustrophedon
Text appearanceRecessed
Execution techniqueIncision
Measure of letters5.9
Chronology
PeriodA
Textual typologyDedicatory text

GENERAL NOTES

At the end of the inscription: mḏ, first two letters of the word mḏbḥ, the last two letters below MuB 745=CSAI I, 91.

TEXT

marker


   1  [Rʾbn b]n R→[ʾ](b)m Ẓwrt ʿ→bd Wr[wʾl]
   2  [hqny] ʾnb→y ʾbʾns¹ w-(k)→l wl[d-hw b-]
   3  [ʿm w-]b ʾnb→y w-b ḏt-Ṣntm→ w-b Wr(w)[ʾl]

Apparatus
1Rʾbn is integrated on the basis of MuB 680-748=CSAI I, 90.
2the integration: [hqny] and wl[d-hw], instead of [s¹qny] and wl[d-s¹], is hypothetical.

TRANSLATIONS

English

   1  Rʾbn son of Rʾbm Ẓwrt servant of Wrwʾl
   2  dedicated to ʾnby (the person of) ʾbʾns¹ and all his children; by
   3  ʿm and by ʾnby and by ḏt Ṣntm and by Wrwʾl.

OBJECT INFORMATION

DepositBayḥān, Museum, 747
Support typeArtefact » Altar
ShapeWith truncated pyramidal base
MaterialStone
Dimensionsh. of the altar 148; h. 22.5, w. 33.5
Link to object record

ORIGIN AND PROVENANCE

Origin
Modern siteHajar Kuḥlān
Ancient siteTmnʿ
Geographical areaWādī Bayḥān
CountryYemen
Archaeological contextReligious context: Temple
NotesThe inscription was found near the northern gate.
Link to site record

CULTURAL NOTES

This text belongs to a group of three short dedicatory inscriptions of "persons and their children" (see also CSAI I, 89=MuB 36 and CSAI I 90=MuB 680+748).
Dedications of "persons" is a pan-South-Arabian cultural characteristic of the archaic period.
It has been maintained that this was a general kind of request for protection by a god over someone and his descendents. However, this formula probably meant someone being consecrated
to the god in order to carry out a certain function in the temple. The relationship between the author of the text and the person dedicated is not at all clear;
the latter would appear to enjoy some kind of special status because he is only mentioned by his individual name, while the dedicant has an onomastic formula complete with his individual name
followed by his patronymic and in some cases his family name. In all the three texts, the dedicant is an official of the same king Wtrʾl. We don't know if this is
historically important, or purely coincidental. Nevertheless, it seems that the establishment of the state of Qataban needed the investiture by the king's officials of persons
who carry out a role connected to the religion.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Arbach et al. 2001: 59-60, pl. 27-29Arbach, Mounir, Avanzini, Alessandra, Bāṭāyiʿ, Aḥmed and Robin, Christian J. 2001. Matériaux pour le corpus des inscriptions qatabānites (II). Raydān, 7: 43-101.